What trend for Comprehensive Income Presentation? Evidence from Italy
Abstract
Since 2007, IAS 1 has introduced two alternative formats (single-statement or twostatement) for the Comprehensive Income presentation into financial statements. The paper proposes a three-year period survey on annual reports of Italian nonfinancial services listed companies that aims to examine in terms of a trend-oriented analysis both the companies’ format choices and the Other Comprehensive Income (OCI) aptitude to explain such choices. The results show that, during the period considered: a) the two-statement option is chosen more often; b) companies rarely change the format; c) there is a constantly low association, or even independence, between the format and the OCI’s consistency, sign and size. These findings confirm that Italy uses the format closer to the national accounting tradition and suggest that the reasons for this choice have to be looked for elsewhere than the OCI. This analysis can be useful both to standard setters, to verify how successful the options they established are, and to accounting scholars, to design further research on the formats under discussion.
Full Text: PDF DOI: 10.15640/ijat.v2n3a2
Abstract
Since 2007, IAS 1 has introduced two alternative formats (single-statement or twostatement) for the Comprehensive Income presentation into financial statements. The paper proposes a three-year period survey on annual reports of Italian nonfinancial services listed companies that aims to examine in terms of a trend-oriented analysis both the companies’ format choices and the Other Comprehensive Income (OCI) aptitude to explain such choices. The results show that, during the period considered: a) the two-statement option is chosen more often; b) companies rarely change the format; c) there is a constantly low association, or even independence, between the format and the OCI’s consistency, sign and size. These findings confirm that Italy uses the format closer to the national accounting tradition and suggest that the reasons for this choice have to be looked for elsewhere than the OCI. This analysis can be useful both to standard setters, to verify how successful the options they established are, and to accounting scholars, to design further research on the formats under discussion.
Full Text: PDF DOI: 10.15640/ijat.v2n3a2
Browse Journals
Journal Policies
Information
Useful Links
- Call for Papers
- Submit Your Paper
- Publish in Your Native Language
- Subscribe the Journal
- Frequently Asked Questions
- Contact the Executive Editor
- Recommend this Journal to Librarian
- View the Current Issue
- View the Previous Issues
- Recommend this Journal to Friends
- Recommend a Special Issue
- Comment on the Journal
- Publish the Conference Proceedings
Latest Activities
Resources
Visiting Status
Today | 100 |
Yesterday | 49 |
This Month | 2406 |
Last Month | 2980 |
All Days | 974093 |
Online | 9 |